%user_javascript%
Apr 2008

Eligibility Date Oddities

For performers, the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame really only has one eligibility prerequisite: "Artists become eligible for induction 25 years after the release of their first record."

This seemingly straightforward rule often has different meanings. In most cases, an artist's "first record" is a single, an EP or an album. But what about a demo tape (like the Talking Heads)? Or a song included on a compilation (like Metallica)?

In today's environment, as the traditional music business models crumble, how will new media rules apply to eligibility dates? Is releasing songs on MySpace official enough (like Black Kids)? Or selling self-pressed CDs at your gigs? The Rock Hall won't have to deal with these issues for a while, but you can bet they will need more clarification in the future.


In going through some of the original eligibility dates of Hall of Famers, one strange case stood out from the rest: Rod Stewart. Stewart was first nominated for the 1993 ceremony, which means he would have had to release his first record by 1967. But Stewart didn't release his first solo work, the album An Old Raincoat Won't Let You Down, until 1969. So Stewart became eligible from his work with the Hoochie Coochie Men (1964), who are definitely not in the Hall of Fame.

Following this logic, does this mean that Stevie Ray Vaughan should already be eligible because he was a member of the band Paul Ray and the Cobras, which released a single in 1975? (Not to worry SRV fans, Stevie hasn't been snubbed -- he hasn't been on the list of eligible artists that the Nominating Committee works from yet.)

It seems like Rod Stewart is just a weird exception to the Rock Hall's prerequisite, but let us know if you find any others.

|

Little Steven advocates The Hollies for 2009

LittleSteven
"Little Steven" Van Zandt, E Street Band guitarist and Rock and Roll Hall of Fame Nominating Committee member, was recently asked about who he will push for induction into the Rock Hall later this year:
Q: You worked hard to get the Dave Clark Five into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame this year. Who's on top of your list now of bands that ought to be in?

A: Right now the priority is the Hollies. It's ridiculous. I think Johnny Burnette & the Rock 'n' Roll Trio is still high on my list. . . . Paul Revere & the Raiders deserve to be in. Herman's Hermits deserve to be in.

Q: Really?!

A: Absolutely. People forget how important Herman's Hermits were when they started. . . . We all get very elitist about who should be in and who shouldn't, but I consider great, great, great '60s pop music absolutely essential to the development of the art form.

Van Zandt is clearly passionate about the artists who helped shape him as a musician during his youth (he was born in 1950), but does he really think the '60s are underrepresented in the Hall of Fame?

The Rock Hall generally nominates at least a couple of bands from the '60s every year, so you can pencil in The Hollies at the top of your list of potential nominees for the 2009 ballot.

Thanks, Tom.

|